[ startgame.dev ]

START GAME

BUILD / PROVE / FUND

A platform for funding indie games through verifiable progress instead of hype. Creators raise in stages, backers fund into escrow, and money releases only when real milestones are delivered.

SCROLL

The current system breaks
in three connected places

Publishers want proof before they engage, developers need capital to build that proof, and backers have lost trust in promise-first crowdfunding.

01

FOR DEVELOPERS

The Funding Paradox

To attract funding - from players, investors, or publishers - you need a playable build to prove your vision. But creating that build requires capital you often do not have. This paradox kills countless indie games before they start.

02

FOR PUBLISHERS

The Proof Gap

A playable build is often the price of admission, but the build alone is rarely enough. Developers also need evidence that the team can deliver, iterate, and hit milestones before a publisher will take the opportunity seriously.

03

FOR BACKERS

The Trust Crisis

Platforms like Kickstarter shift all risk onto backers. When projects under-deliver or fail entirely, the money is gone. That accumulated frustration and skepticism makes early-stage funding harder for legitimate teams.

Kickstarter meets GitHub,
built on trust and transparency

Three pillars designed to replace hype with proof - for both sides of every campaign.

PILLAR A

Milestone-Based Escrow

Funds are held in a smart contract vault visible to all. Capital releases only per approved milestone - never upfront.

Customizable milestone count and thresholds Devs set their own extension and voting rules Campaign design signals confidence to backers

PILLAR B

Hybrid Verification

A unique 3-layer system replaces subjective judgment with structured proof.

AI agents: code quality scans and instant feedback Community review: backers vote on milestones Disputes: expert arbitrators give a final ruling

PILLAR C

On-Chain Transparency

Every deliverable - code, art, builds - receives a permanent blockchain record. Verifiable progress, full accountability.

Immutable record of what was delivered and when Public vault balance visible at all times Proof layer for publisher due diligence

Staged, verifiable funding -
not a one-time leap of faith

01

Developers define milestones and funding needs

Backers know exactly what is being built, what each stage unlocks, and what proof of completion looks like before pledging a single dollar.

02

Backers pledge into escrow

Rather than releasing all funds upfront, capital is held in a transparent smart contract vault - visible to everyone, controlled by no one.

03

Developers submit proof of progress

As milestones are completed, developers submit evidence: code, builds, art assets, or other agreed deliverables.

04

The platform verifies delivery

AI checks run first, then community review. Expert arbitrators step in only if there is a dispute - keeping the process fast and fair.

05

Funds released for approved work only

Capital flows directly to delivery. Backers only pay for what gets built. Developers prove progress, earn trust, and unlock the next stage.

Why this matters
for publisher deals

Getting a publishing deal requires a playable build - but a build alone rarely scores a deal. You need the build and the evidence. Startgame.dev generates that evidence as a natural byproduct of funding.

1 in 625

first-contact pitches result in a signed deal. The funnel is brutal - Startgame helps developers arrive at each stage with verifiable proof in hand.

TYPICAL PUBLISHER DEALFLOW

First Contact 1000
Follow-up Mtg 253
Thesis Fit 170
Play Session 86
Due Diligence 11
Signed 1.6

Common questions

Why not just use Kickstarter?

Kickstarter is trust-first. Startgame.dev is proof-first and milestone-based. Backers do not fund a promise - they fund a track record of verified delivery.

Who decides if a milestone is done?

A hybrid system: automated checks run first, community input follows, and expert review steps in only if there is a dispute - keeping things fast and fair without single points of failure.

What kind of proof counts?

Code, playable builds, art assets, and other milestone deliverables. Any tangible evidence that real progress was made - defined upfront by the developer and agreed to by backers.

Is this mainly a crypto project?

No. The core idea is better funding infrastructure for game development. Blockchain and smart contracts are backend tools for escrow, transparency, and verification - not the product itself.

Who is this for first?

Primarily indie game developers who need early funding, and backers who want more trust and accountability. The platform is designed to serve both sides equally.